Truth in Textbooks Joins Forces with “The Report Card”

by TTT Coalition on November 23, 2017

Truth in Textbooks is excited to announce a new partner to join with the Florida Citizen’s Alliance in our fight to return truth to our children’s social studies textbooks, The Report Card.

 The Report Card

Posting announcing partnership between The Report and Truth in Textbooks

“The Report Card” founded by Bill Korach in 2011 has the express goal of “restoring truth to education”.  Based out of Florida but with a readership that stretches across the United States, “The Report Card” keeps its readers up to date on education trends at the K-12 as well on college campuses.

The Report Card is at the forefront of exposing biases found in the textbooks and other flaws within the American education system that corrupt the foundational principles America is founded upon.

Just a few of the hundreds of articles relating to education are below:

Exposing the dangers of Common Core

Trump Supports School Choice, Opposes Common Core-Is Attacked by Teachers Union
New Book Proves Common Core is Bad for American Education

Exposing the liberal biases on college campuses

Prof: Left-wing College Dominance is a Disease
Multiculturalism at Yale: Remove Portraits of White Men

Agenda laden sex education, promoting transgender agendas and promotion of a pro-LGBT agenda in schools

Delaware K-12 Kids to Decide Gender & Race Without Parent Consent
Pediatrician and Pastor Oppose Transgender School Indoc-“It’s Child Abuse”
LGBT Bullies Sue St. Johns FL Schools to Force Transgender Bathrooms

Exposing the madness of multiculturalism

School Librarian Scorns First Lady’s Dr. Seuss Gift: Books are “Racist
White Authors Verboten at Reed College

Based in Florida, The Report Card has loyal Floridians who have taken up The Report Card’s call to become activists in their school districts in taking back the classroom from “educrats” who for years have gone unchallenged.

Truth in Textbooks is proud to partner with readers of The Report Card and hope those who follow TNT will join the mailing list for The Report Card by  adding your name to the right on the The Report Card homepage on the right side of the homepage where you can enter your email address.

You can also “Like” their Facebook page by clicking here.

We urge those supporters of The Report Card to sign up to participate in the Truth in Textbooks training for volunteers on how to become social studies textbook reviewers.

Persons can write to to start the process or can visit this link to learn more about how to participate.


Truth in Textbooks (TNT) conducted a thorough review of a Mexican American textbook under consideration by the Texas State Board of Education by the author Tony Diaz entitled “The Mexican American Studies ToolKit”.

The full review (51 pages) can be found at this link.  It was completed by Dr. Sandra Alfonsi, Truth in Textbooks Senior Academic Fellow.  She has 25 years of experience. reviewing social studies textbooks and has worked with Truth in Textbooks since its inception in 2013.

The executive summary of the review is below followed by a few examples found in the report.


This is perhaps the most wholly inadequate “textbook” I have seen or reviewed. It is long on opinion and short on historical context and content.  It should not be in any classroom. In my opinion, the book skews toward a random, opinion based storybook that presents itself as the history of Mexican Americans. As such, it trivializes the field of Mexican American Study and the cause of Mexican American and Latino rights.  The children of Texas would be grossly misinformed on the importance of Mexican heritage and the contributions Hispanics have enriched the culture of America.   

The book is problematic because it encourages the development of opinions by implication and innuendo instead of encouraging critical thinking through the examination of various perspectives and accounts. The book has anti-America sentiments, anti-Mainstream, anti-White, encourages radicalization as a part of being a good citizen, encourages and promotes civil disobedience, and implies civil anarchism is a good thing.  What also makes this book dangerous is the author holds himself up as the role model after whom the children should pattern themselves. By taking this approach, the book comes off as unseemly and strikes me as a form of self-promotion that I have never seen in my twenty-five years of reviewing textbooks.  Texas children and taxpayers who fund these purchases deserve books of a much higher standard than demonstrated by this submission.

To address the basic academic quality of this book: it is replete with grammatical errors, spelling errors, obtuse vocabulary, non-sequiturs and incorrect interpretation of language (Spanish to English translations and meanings.)

To address the documentation upon which this book rests:

  • Most of the book has NO source references and therefore little historical accuracy. Many “observations” are the author’s “perceived” interpretation of history versus what most history book in laying out well researched out facts on historical events.
  • My major concern is, however, the history with accompanying references given in a few of the chapters. The history and the accompanying sources are correct. The problem is how the author presents the documented history. He presents it as historical proof of his biased thematic approach with which he indoctrinates his students.

I highly commend the members of the State Review Panel for their commitment, not only to truth in education but to the children of Texas and I fully support their objective and well-reasoned Recommendation to NOT approve this book. I concur that the children of Texas deserve an education that will prepare them to approach life unbiased and capable of judging and making circumspect decisions that will impact their lives and the lives of American society. This can only be done if they learn with accurate, unopinionated and agenda-less textbooks and additional curriculum materials. This book cannot and does not respond to any of these guidelines.


Just a few of the 59 false or misleading entries that illustrate this book is more about indoctrination than about educating students about the contributions of Hispanics to the American culture and history.

  • “But maybe we still don’t exist. Fifty-nine years later, there is not one Mexican American Studies building at any Texas university (mind you, Garcia’s own home state) that I can walk into and study the oral arguments he gave to the Supreme Court. The Justices even granted him extra time, a rare feat, a further testament to his skill.”
  • The University of Texas has a Mexican American Studies Department, a Center for Mexican American Studies, a Department of Mexican American and Latina/o Studies, and several interdisciplinary programs in Mexican American Studies.  Texas A& M University has the Latino/a and Mexican American Studies.  University of Texas Rio Grand Valley has Mexican American Studies, School of Interdisciplinary Programs and DiversityUniversity of Houston Center for Mexican American StudiesUniversity of Texas at Arlington Center for Mexican American Studies, UT El-Paso Chicano Studies, UT-San Antonio Department of Bi-Cultural-Bi-Lingual Studies and several more here, here and here.
  • “I thought I was a hyphenated American because I chose to call myself a Mexican-American. But looking at my resume, I realize I earned the designation because I’ve worked as a free-lance journalist, a teaching-assistant, and an assistant-editor. That must be why I am on un-employment.”
  • The author’s constant sarcasm is often laden with errors. In this case the only word actually hyphenated is free-lance.
  • “Mexican Americans had been socialized into accepting American values, that is, they had been manufactured into becoming better U.S. citizens. A large number of them had come to adopt notions of Americanism. Ideas of U.S. citizenship, Americanization, and accommodation were common themes expressed by the Mexican American Generation. Assimilation into American political and cultural mainstream had become the most effective way for responding to the oppressive conditions facing their communities.”
  • Blatant attack on the Mexican Americans who worked within the American system to better themselves and their communities. The author teaches by implication scorn for and refutation of America and its legal system, including the Constitution.
  • “Texican (also Texas Mexican)—A Tejano who wants to emphasize the Mexican influence in hisor her identify as in the ‘HECHO EN TEJAS: An Anthology of Texas Mexican Writers.’ ”
  • Texican  – A person living in Texas during the time of the Republic of Texas. A person modern who advocates that Texas secede from the United States. Source:
  • “U.S. Latinos, as a group, have suffered widespread discrimination. On the other hand, many Latinos have fortunately never suffered discrimination. This group consequently fails to empathize with efforts to seek equality and fair treatment. Many within this latter group adamantly assert that they are “Americans” and refuse to identify with activists seeking justice. In many cases, a light-skinned complexion has helped make life more “American” for them. In addition, others avoid the more blatant and negative treatment that Mexicans in particular have suffered. This group prefers to avoid the stigma that the term “Mexican” conveys. Besides the label American, they prefer an alternative, euphemistic label like Hispanic, Latin, or Spanish-speaking American.”
  • While this is historically “accurate”, it is another example of the author’s disdain for America and of the Latinos who choose to identify themselves as Americans.
  • :Latinx —This is the most recent term introduced to the discussion of American identity. Its most prominent aspect is the letter “x” at the end. Once users figure out how to correctly pronounce the word, if they are familiar with Spanish, they realize that the “x” overrides Spanish gender rules for words. Previous attempts to override those grammatical rules have led to versions such as Latino/s and Latin@s. The version of the term using @ has fallen out of favor since the “@” has moved on to bigger and greater things with its prominent role in social media. As of this writing, millennials have embraced the term the most. It now faces an uphill battle of capturing the imagination of more Americans who may not have access to the full explanation of what the term signifies. The term is exciting because it is a chance to define ourselves. Pushback comes from the fact that change comes slow. It has more currency with folks via social media. Older generations may have not even heard the term. Also, if an individual is emotionally invested in identity terms such as this, they may resist any new term.”
  • Outright fabrication “Latinx is used generally as a gender-neutral term for Latin Americans, but it has been especially embraced by members of Latin LGBTQ communities as a word to identify themselves as people of Latin descent possessing a gender identity outside the male/female binary.” Source:

Please contact your State Board of Education member and urge them to vote against adoption of this inaccurate and agenda laden textbook. You can find your particularly  SBOE member here or use this email address to all of the members,

Removal of Some Social Studies Texas Essential Knowledge Skills (TEKS) – How To Prevent Further Dilution of Our History?

October 13, 2017

Mandated Removal of Social Studies TEKS (Standards)-Why? Texas teachers are faced with too much material to cover in an ever shrinking classroom schedule dedicated to actual teaching. This is true from the perspective of teachers, parents and administrators…too much has been added that is “required” to be tested and taught. An Opening to Remove Important […]

Read the full article →

Spreading TNT to Seattle and Bellevue WA

September 6, 2017

A great luncheon and dinner presentation to concerned Washingtonians this week resulted in some new relationships and exposure for TNT.  This was arranged by Ann, one of our TNT reviewers. She reached out to representatives from other patriotic and education oriented groups who are also concerned about the instructional materials found in our children’s classrooms. […]

Read the full article →

Truth in Textbooks – Training Recap + Future Plans

August 26, 2017

2016 – 2017 TNT Recap – Lots of Training!   Link to latest TNT Info Brochure   Truth in Textbooks continues to conduct training sessions for interested volunteers.  In 2016 TNT conducted three training classes and so far in 2017 two classes have been conducted.  Our current class of 40+ volunteers will bring our total […]

Read the full article →

Changes at Truth in Textbooks (Formerly Known as Truth in Texas Textbooks)

January 17, 2016

Truth in Textbooks (TNT), formerly known as Truth in Texas Textbooks (TTT) is joining with  Textbook Alert  to form the most extensive teams of social studies textbook reviewers in the country. TNT is seeking volunteers to review social studies textbooks with training classes beginning in April, July and Oct 2016. You can write to […]

Read the full article →

TTT Report Card Posted & FAQ

February 1, 2015

For those waiting for the TTT Report Card, it has now been posted for your use.   The goal of this one page report (front and back) TTT Final Textbooks Ratings_31_Jan_2015 is to provide parents, concerned citizens, school board members and others a simple tool that can be used to impact the decisions on which social studies […]

Read the full article →

Mid-Term Report Card Coming Soon!

January 20, 2015

TTT Update – Local Districts Reviewing Textbooks Currently the 1200+ school districts in Texas are in the process of setting up review panels and beginning the arduous task of reviewing nearly 90 social studies instructional materials. By the end of February the committees will make their recommendations to the local school boards for approval and […]

Read the full article →

Merry Christmas and Update from TTT

December 25, 2014

This is part of a post I shared with our volunteers that includes an update on TTT and our progress in preparing our “report card” of the textbooks reviewed. On behalf of all of the volunteers at TTT we wish to wish a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah and a Happy New Year to all visitors […]

Read the full article →

TTT Reviewers Testify Before SBOE

December 8, 2014

On Friday, November 21, 2014 something monumental happened in Austin, Texas, at the State Board of Education meeting.  The Truth in Texas Textbooks (TTT) Coalition changed the perception that says, “Average citizens cannot make a difference in the content of students’ textbooks.”  TTT is a grassroots organization composed of average concerned citizens formed in October […]

Read the full article →